选专业应基于就业前景还是个人兴趣

Sophie's point about passion driving excellence is well-taken, but Brian's financial realism deserves equal weight. The false choice between passion and practicality obscures a more useful question: how can students design a path that integrates both? The answer is a 'major plus skill' strategy. Students should choose a major they genuinely enjoy — Sophie is right that intrinsic motivation predicts academic success — but pair it with a marketable technical skill through electives, minors, or certificates. A philosophy major who learns data analysis, or a history major who masters a programming language, combines the critical thinking that passionate study develops with the concrete employability that Brian demands. Brian's coffee-shop anecdote is misleading because it describes people who studied passion without adding skills, not people who were undone by passion itself. Sophie's examples of successful passionate people also suffer from survivorship bias — for every entrepreneur who followed their passion to success, many more struggled. The 'major plus skill' approach hedges against both Brian's and Sophie's failure modes: it prevents the passion-without-income trap while avoiding the soul-crushing tedium of a purely practical major that kills motivation.