海外学习项目是否应成为必修

Ryan's concern about equity is the strongest argument against mandatory study abroad, and Emma's proposed solution — folding costs into tuition — would actually worsen the problem by raising tuition for everyone, including those who cannot participate. However, the underlying goal Emma articulates is sound: cross-cultural competence is a genuine professional asset. The alternative is not to abandon this goal but to achieve it through domestic means. Universities could require a domestic cultural immersion experience — working with immigrant communities, completing an internship in a culturally distinct region within the country, or participating in a virtual international collaboration project with partner universities abroad. These alternatives deliver much of the intercultural learning Emma values at a fraction of the cost and with none of the logistical barriers Ryan identifies. A tiered system could also work: students who can afford overseas study are encouraged to pursue it, while all students complete a meaningful intercultural requirement that can be satisfied domestically. This approach makes cross-cultural learning universal without making overseas travel mandatory, addressing both Ryan's equity concern and Emma's educational goal.